-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gary Morgan schrieb:
>
> This is after tweaking memlocks, nice %s , buffers and so on.
>
> I know that chipset sound, is not a very efficient recording interface, but
> it seems there is more going on, besides that.
>
> I have two main questions here (they sum up to: how much of this is the
> chipset?)
> a. i had heard here and there in forums that the RT kernel in 9.04 and on
> was 'broken'. is that true?
9.4 was broken 9.10 works very good for me...
> b. Is RT only worth using for higher end machines with more ram and separate
> sound cards?
no - the opposite is true: with a proper rt-kernel you can run critical
stuff on lower machines also. It just grabs everything your box can do
for audio...
> And one more: Would anyone recommend using a different audio OS for this
> situation, like 64 studio?
Not really, wait until it is stable I would suggest...
If you want to try something debianish go for pure:dyne or AVLinux.
>(i might have mentioned jacklab, but it seems
> that project has been killed)
Not so much killed but died more or less without big shock and awe...
Still OpenSuse is very good for audio with the rt-kernel from jengelh
installed...
best regs
HZN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksB1DMACgkQ1Aecwva1SWNvpgCeMtKpL1JZBCgtQxgdYSOoD2Nd
PgcAoIezwBpz2kK4B5OXMP2cGOelPpmz
=PJFS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Nov 17 04:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 17 2009 - 04:15:02 EET