Re: [LAU] Google wave

2009/11/18 Bengt Gördén <bengan@email-addr-hidden>

> Hi,
>
> Anyone using it? It's in its infant state but there might be some light
> there.
> Today I found a gadget/robot[1] that actually lets you collaborate by
> writing
> music score. Sort of useful. Definitely not for advanced users of music
> notation. Not yet anyway. But when your sitting down together and trying to
> communicate a riff or similar it might be handy. I actually tried to use a
> bit
> advanced GUIDO in it. My browser still, 20min later tries to render the
> notation :-)
>
> Another thought. There's also the name space question. If Google Wave gets
> big
> and people start using it the name space will be cluttered with people
> stealing/borrowing names for waves. It might be appropriate applications
> like
> Ardour to actually register that name as gadget/bot/account.
>
> I searched for a couple of tags that I thought would fit for linux audio
> usage. At least my use. Here's the result:
>
>
> tag: hits
> ---------------
> alsa: 6
> pulseaudio: 7
> ardour: 2
> jackd: 0
> qjackctl: 0
> linuxaudio: 1
> lilypond: 5
> linuxsampler: 0
> fluidsynth: 0
>
>
>
> [1] http://saliery-wave.appspot.com (using GUIDO format)
>

Yeah, been playing around on it for the past 2 weeks or so. My first bot is
still a template pybot, any other interesting ideas?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Nov 18 16:15:03 2009