Depends entirely on specifically what you're trying to do. I'm using my setup as a live-gig MIDI module, in the sense that when I play a note on my keyboard, it sends noteon/noteoff via MIDI to the box, which either (a) puts out that note as close to zero-latency as possible or (b) delays everything, which hurts live cohesion in many ways, not the least being my fellow band-members taking cues from the positions my fingers are in.Just wondering. Without an RT kernel here, my 2 laptops seem to run my simple audio needs pretty well at 64msec latency. At least, it's never bothered my playing along with computer-generated audio. I don't do any heavy-duty audio work here. Once I tried Jackrack, put one effect in it (that worked) or one amplifer (that worked) but trying to use both didn't. But I don't know if that had so much to do with latency or lack of RT kernel as with a smallish amount of memory and an underpowered processor driving the whole thing. Now that I''ve upgraded the memory on both laptops, perhaps it would work? On musicbox, with 512MB, using a single good quality (larger) soundfont was enough to cause problems. With 768MB in it, it works without problems. I see people on the list running much lower latencies than 64msec, and seemingly trying to get even lower ... So, just wondering.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Dec 12 20:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 12 2009 - 20:15:03 EET