Re: [LAU] [LAD] Is TerminatorX development stalled?

Well the reason for why I'd like to develope tX is its midi capabilities
and the workflow.
I want to use it as a sampler triggered by an external sequencer, and
not actually as a DJ-proggy. I dont know how good the midi capabilities
of Mixx are.

In general Mixxx and tX are incomparable, since Mixxx only allows for 2
turntables, or am I wrong?
Gerald

On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:20 +0100, Dubphil wrote:

> rosea grammostola a écrit , Le 30.12.2009 22:53:
> > gerald mwangi wrote:
> >
> >> OK, I'll start to work on it, but it will take some time.
> >> Maybe someone has experience with librubberband?
> >> Gerald
> >>
> > Is it really a good idea to spend time on TerminatorX? Couldn't you
> > better add 'Abbleton features' to mixxx, hydrogen or non-sequencer/daw?
> > It looks to me those apps have more potential to survive.
> > I could be wrong though.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > \r
> >
>
> Mixxx hasn't the same scratch taste, Tx scratch effect is really
> amazing, I don't know why...
> IMHO It would be nice to make it survive, but personnaly I don't need
> the Ableton feature :)
>
> Regards
>
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Dec 31 16:15:04 2009