On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:35:37 -0500 (EST)
Rick Green <rtg@aapsc.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:00:31PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> >
> >> if that means what i think it means (equivalent input noise), and i'm
> >> not totally out of touch with the state of preamp technology, i'd say
> >> all but the 106, the 99 and the ? are bogus. and i'm not even sure about
> >> the 106 :)
> >
> > First of all, all these numbers should have a minus sign in
> > front of them, and for them to be informative at all I'd
> > want to know if they are dBu or dBV.
> >
> On the source website (theatreofnoise.com), he claims:
>
> In this article I will measure noise using Equivalent Input Noise (EIN)
> A-weighted at 150 ohms, measured in dBu.
OK, somehow I missed this - Note to self, slow down while reading!
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Feb 2 04:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 02 2010 - 04:15:03 EET