Re: [LAU] more than 4 channels for listening? Really?

From: Bearcat M. Sandor <hometheater@email-addr-hidden-soul.com>
Date: Thu Feb 25 2010 - 23:24:12 EET

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 11:27 -0700, Bearcat M. Sandor wrote:
>
>> Couldn't one create the sound of a fly moving through out a room simply
>> by adjusting the balance of 4 speakers?
>>
>
> Yes, of course, this has been in the computer music composer's toolbox
> for quite a number of years. For a little bit of background see (for
> example):
>
> http://cec.concordia.ca/eContact/Multichannel/spatial_music_short.html
>
>
>> If so why do we need more than 4 speakers?
>>
>
> If you are using amplitude panning and any two speakers are more than 60
> degrees apart in angle (or so) it becomes increasingly difficult to
> create convincing virtual images between the speakers. The virtual image
> tends to jump from one speaker to the other instead of smoothly panning
> between them (this is an extreme simplification, of course).
>
> -- Fernando
>
>
>
Thanks Fernando! I look forward to reading that article. Skimming it
now, it looks interesting.

So the speaker angle is more important than distance? It's the angles
relative to the listener, right? So a center channel is designed for
people who are sitting off axis and otherwise not needed?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Feb 26 00:15:08 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 26 2010 - 00:15:08 EET