Re: [LAU] measuring "average RMS"

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Mar 17 2010 - 21:05:25 EET

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:56:08PM +0100, Atte André Jensen wrote:

> fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>
> > Note that the result is *not* the 'average RMS' level
> > but the maximum RMS over any 1 second period.
>
> In fact I think that's even more what I'd want. I'm trying to figure out
> if I over-compress my audio, and to that end soft passages don't really
> count...

Depends on what you call 'over-compressing'. If you're
using heavy compression to squeeze out the last dB on
material that is already high level most of the time
you're right.

OTOH, compressing a classical piece from 40dB dynamic
range to just a few dB is certainly 'over-compressing'
to my taste, yet it would probably make little or no
differerence to the value measured by 'normalize -n'.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Mar 18 00:15:01 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 18 2010 - 00:15:01 EET