2010/4/6 James Morris <james@email-addr-hidden-art.net>:
> On Sun, April 4, 2010 00:27, James Morris wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wondering why the 64bit Puredyne does not include Ardour?
>>
>> And how this might affect building it from source?
>
> Still wondering...
It's a fair question. It wasn't me that made that decision (I don't
use ardour), and I don't see an audit trail why they went for
ardour-i686 - I'll ask the others.
> I've been using Debian in the past, compiling kernels, JACK, ALSA, etc,etc
> from source, but recently switched to Gentoo. Then other things got in the
> way of setting up audio production software so have nothing running.
>
> I'm kinda sick of building stuff from source at the moment so (64bit) Pure
> Dyne looked like the solution to that, but without ardour2, it's just not.
> Disappointing.
>
> And why punish us with grub2? I had a hellish time trying to configure it
> a couple of months ago and gave up and installed legacy grub.
It's the (barely-documented) future I'm afraid...
Dan
-- http://www.mcld.co.uk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Apr 7 00:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 07 2010 - 00:15:02 EEST