Re: [LAU] Netjack1, transport sync and tempo

Aurelien wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:37:42AM +0200, torbenh wrote :
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:34:11AM +0200, Aurelien wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm always hesitating between netjack1/2.
>>>
>>> Considering netjack1 and sync transport. I works fine, but I would like
>>> the master to set the tempo for the slave(s), and it looks like netjack1
>>> does not that (in the jackdmp version, at least). Am I wrong? Is there a
>>> way to get the tempo from master to slave?
>> no. you definitely need a transportmaster on the slave.
>
> OK.
> This gives another point to netjack2!
>
> Concerning my problems with my network, it finally seems like both my
> gigabit ethernet cards (Atheros Attansic L1) works in .... 10MB!!! That
> should explain why I get these offset of 3 to 16 (!!!) cycles!
>
> It's weird, as the card is supported by the kernel, and lshw tells it
> works at 1GB, but however, rate is around 10MB and lower.

Hmmm - you don't happen to have your gigabit cards connected via a
non-gigabit router/switch? Faster cards will usually happily connect at
slower speeds if that's the best something along the way can do ...

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user