Re: [LAU] perhaps why some of us have more trouble w/ pulseaudio than others (ICE1712/M-audio delta problem w/ pulseaudio)

Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
>> to pro-audio.
>>
>> best regs
>> HZN
>
> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
> soundcard.

Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user