Re: [LAU] perhaps why some of us have more trouble w/ pulseaudio than others (ICE1712/M-audio delta problem w/ pulseaudio)

On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
> >> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
> >> to pro-audio.
> >>
> >> best regs
> >> HZN
> >
> > PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
> > that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
> > struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
> > latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
> > soundcard.
>
> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
>

???

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon May 10 16:15:03 2010