On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:00 -1000, david wrote:
> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, david <gnome@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >> rosea.grammostola wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 23:34 -1000, david wrote:
> >>>> Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> This musing about "broken" alsa-drivers that need to be "fixed" in the
> >>>>>> thread at PA increases the bad feeling about PA's relation and awarenes
> >>>>>> to pro-audio.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> best regs
> >>>>>> HZN
> >>>>> PA is specifically for 'desktop' usage, pro-audio isn't a part of
> >>>>> that. If you're doing pro-audio you'd be running JACK anyway. I
> >>>>> struggle to understand why a user would want PA, with all the inherent
> >>>>> latency concerns (compared to JACK) to control their pro-audio
> >>>>> soundcard.
> >>>> Perhaps Pulse really just wants to get rid of JACK in the first place?
> >>> ???
> >> Replace JACK entirely with Pulse, become the only audio server game in town?
> >> ;-)
> >
> > Yeah, world domination is ALWAYS on the agenda I'm sure. Which is why
> > Pulseaudio automatically suspends its control of a sound card with
> > jack2 requests control =)
>
> Maybe in some version of PulseAudio you have. The one I used to have
> here did not. So I removed it. Simpler that way. I guess I still
> consider PulseAudio unnecessary for any purpose.
>
For reference (not specifically directed to you), more recent versions
of Pulse (not sure exactly which) and jack2 (jackdmp) cooperate in that
form. Recent distributions should have it sorted, unless they're using
jack1.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue May 11 04:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 11 2010 - 04:15:01 EEST