Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan and Dragon,
>
> (Dragon, I got your other message... thanks!)
>
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Ivan Tarozzi wrote:
>
>> the patch doesn't works. I have the same behavior.
>
> :-/ Thanks for trying.
>
>> 1. When I execute StretchPlayer, it show the CPU label to 4%. But using
>> top or system monitor I can see CPU for this process at 62%
>
> If you minimize stretchplayer, does this go down to nearly zero?
> Looks like the GUI is over-active. Maybe this is a part of the problem.
>
you may be right, cause also the x is eating like 10 times more cpu once
the stretchplayer is started.
>
> Thanks! I'm a bit puzzled ATM... so I'm going to do some pondering,
> first. :-)
>
> BTW, did 0.500 work fine for you guys? (I got the impression that it
> /did/ for Dragan.)
yes, the 0.5 worked good here.
cheers,
doc
>
> Thanks,
> Gabriel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Jun 13 00:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 13 2010 - 00:15:02 EEST