Re: [LAU] New music: And it's time for: Bach again! Bach again! :-)

From: Ken Restivo <ken@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Jun 26 2010 - 09:28:23 EEST

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:11:32AM -0500, Josh Lawrence wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Atte Andr? Jensen <atte@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Fast bebop is almost even 8ths :-)
>
> yes! you have no idea how long it took me to figure this out. and I
> agree with your earlier statement that Bach sounds better when played
> straight.
>
> I think too many people think jazz = swing. I'm not even going to
> attempt to define jazz, but I think restricting it to only swing is
> wrong.
>
> also, I hear a lot of complicated harmonies implied by even the
> simplest of bach's pieces (as you said, b9, etc.). I guess to him
> they were all passing tones...but I guess they are to us, too.
>
> I'm getting dangerously close to spitting opinions on things and
> revealing my ignorance here, but in my mind, bach is what jazz
> could/should grow up to be, that is if it hasn't already.
>
> tl;dr - bach would dig charlie parker :)
>

Fictionary is almost all straight 8ths, and that's some fantastic complex jazz.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObTvXg5P7t0

So is all the jazz/funk fusion magic of the 70s. Definitely jazz, but it's not swing for sure.

To drift off topic even further: it took me a while to figure out that the "secret sauce" of Medeski, Martin, and Wood, is Billy Martin's hinting at swing by accenting upbeats.

-ken
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Jun 26 12:15:01 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 26 2010 - 12:15:01 EEST