Re: [LAU] No batch processing on Linux?

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:10:59PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Sunday 26 September 2010 06:45:42 Joel Roth wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > > And because python afaik still
> > > has the big interpreter lock, effectively suppressing any python multi-
> > > threading. Which you work around by re-implementing your heavy-math parts
> > > in C and run them outside the interpreter lock (but still from within
> > > threads created and managed from python)...
> >
> > What, no native threads. Mock horror!
>
> Native threads: Yes.
> But only one python interpreter to run. At least in python2.X.
> As long as you call long-running non-python functions in the other threads,
> you are fine (like the run() function of your audio-apps jack-engine).

Interesting. There do seem to be a growing number of python
apps for audio, video and music.

So far the unix process model serves my needs well enough.

Regards,

Joel
 
> Arnold

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

-- 
Joel Roth
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user