Re: [LAU] No batch processing on Linux?

This seems to change everything for Audio with Python:
http://code.google.com/p/pyo/

2010/9/26 Joel Roth <joelz@email-addr-hidden>:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:10:59PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>> On Sunday 26 September 2010 06:45:42 Joel Roth wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>> > > And because python afaik still
>> > > has the big interpreter lock, effectively suppressing any python multi-
>> > > threading. Which you work around by re-implementing your heavy-math parts
>> > > in C and run them outside the interpreter lock (but still from within
>> > > threads created and managed from python)...
>> >
>> > What, no native threads. Mock horror!
>>
>> Native threads: Yes.
>> But only one python interpreter to run. At least in python2.X.
>> As long as you call long-running non-python functions in the other threads,
>> you are fine (like the run() function of your audio-apps jack-engine).
>
> Interesting. There do seem to be a growing number of python
> apps for audio, video and music.
>
> So far the unix process model serves my needs well enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Joel
>
>> Arnold
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
> --
> Joel Roth
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 27 04:15:02 2010