Re: [LAU] Subject: Albums under a label recorded and/or mixed with Linux

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Sep 28 2010 - 15:14:13 EEST

On Tuesday 28 September 2010 13:15:57 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> On Mon, September 27, 2010 12:31 pm, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday 26 September 2010 02:22:21 fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> >> 4. To assemble a set of recorings into a coherent whole.
> >> (4) still valid.
> >> * Multi-band compression. Maybe. But if that improves the result, it's
> >> much easier to apply compression while mixing, on selected tracks. The
> >> 'multi-band' thing is there only to try and separate things again, and
> >> usually it fails. IMHO dynamics are part of the mixing step, no excuses.
> >
> > There is one exception to this rule:
> >
> > When you have a stereo feed from the console and a stereo feed from room
> > mics,
> > you can't get back to "mixing" to fix the issues that you can easily fix
> > with
> > multi-band compression.
> >
> >
> > If jamin's eq was replaced with a real parametric eq, that would be cool.
> > It
> > would fix a lot of issues raised and lower the cpu-usage. *dreaming*
>
> Just for the sake of clarity, now the problem is that jamin doesn't have a
> real parametric eq?
>
> Or is the main issue that it uses more resources than necessary and can be
> optimised?

My issue is that it has an awfully bloated filter (which is suboptimal
according to fons) taking up a lot of cpu-power, while for me it could
perfectly to with a parametric eq (either three bands + shelve or four bands).

Have fun,

Arnold

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Received on Tue Sep 28 16:15:08 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 28 2010 - 16:15:08 EEST