Re: [LAU] OT: C or C++?

From: Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabrbedd@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 14 2010 - 17:50:04 EEST

On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Chris Cannam wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo
> <mle+la@email-addr-hidden-nerd.com> wrote:
>> I've been using C++ for nearly 20 years (including the last 8+
>> years professionally) and I am nowhere near mastering it. In
>> fact, when you add in commonly used things like STL and Boost,
>> I find the language is growing faster than I'm learning it.
>
> Same here -- and it's not just that it grows, but that "common
> practice" both varies amongst programmers and evolves over time. C++
> is an awfully deep language.

Yes, I was trying to keep it simple. But I think in 2 years
you can at least "hold your own." :-)

> Also, I'm increasingly unconvinced that it's wise for someone who
> intends to end up writing idiomatic C++ to be too comfortable in C
> first -- if you're going to learn C thoroughly, aim to come out the

Did you mean to say "not to be too comfortable" ? If so, I
totally agree. :-)

-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Oct 15 00:15:01 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 15 2010 - 00:15:01 EEST