On 01.11.2010 15:27, fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:47:15AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>
>> <pshirkey@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> No more normalising for me.
>>>
>> That's good, because I can't possibly imagine what you lead you think
>> that this would make sense for a polyphonic/multitrack. Normalize is
>> very useful for (say) creating sample loops/libraries so that
>> everything is at a standard level. But you would *never* *ever* use it
>> to export a mix.
>>
> Which seems to confirm that the normalisation is not applied to
> the mixed signal (which would require two passes or a lot of
> storage), but probably on individual regions or tracks. The
> option just should not be available on a dialog that leads
> to exporting anything else but individual tracks or parts of
> them.
>
> Ciao,
>
>
"
Which seems to confirm that the normalisation is not applied to
the mixed signal (which would require two passes or a lot of
storage)
"
Nope, Ardour3 offers the option of normalization in the export menu ,
there is a mask where u edit "formats", and there it is(top left)
And indeed, if you have a machine fast enough, you may also right-click
a region and "normalize" it while playing, i dont know how its done
actually, but as ardour has the peaks, it may just search for the
highest value and internally gain the difference.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Nov 1 20:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 20:15:01 EET