Re: [LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

From: Eric Steinberg <eric.steinberg@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Nov 17 2010 - 22:43:09 EET

I have never noticed any artifacts with downconverting of samplerate, except
on lower-quality Windows conversion software and early versions of Steinberg
Wavelab (no relation!). Upconversion is another story....is there a quick
and easy way to measure if conversion artifacts are present in an audio
file?

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hiddenwrote:

> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Eric Steinberg
> <eric.steinberg@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your samplerate? Just curious; I use
> > 44.1 if I'm going to CD, 48 if I'm doing pro video, and 96 or 192 if I
> want
> > really high fidelity- but I've never used 88.2.
>
> its 2x 44.1 so that resampling to CD format is very artifact free, but
> you get the benefits of a higher SR.
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Nov 18 00:15:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 18 2010 - 00:15:03 EET