Re: [LAU] Realtime latency kernel testing

From: Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 12 2010 - 20:22:28 EET

On 12/12/2010 06:42 PM, Ronald Stewart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would go with what Robin said. That being said, Robin's tweaks on
> Transmission last year on 89 set the pace for our build (brilliant!). Since
> then tuning jack2 (jackdmp) Rui's rtirq, plus tuning for specific chips /
> computer hardware makes a difference. If you want something now that truly
> stands up and has had some of the best Linux developers touch the project,
> go with Transmission 4.2. I know Paul will jump in and tune us all up with
> our thoughts (go Paul!) but it should be stated again we are getting lights
> out performance without RT on our new multi-touch Tablets for Pro Audio with
> 2.6.35, Meego/AtomN450.

So with 2.6.35 rtirq also works with a non real-time kernel?

Best,

Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 12 20:15:09 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 12 2010 - 20:15:09 EET