Re: [LAU] Which SATA drive? Size? [Was: Re: partition table]

From: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Dec 25 2010 - 04:22:22 EET

On 12/24/2010 05:49 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 12/25/2010 01:03 AM, Mark Knecht wrote
>> Or choose a different WD drive that doesn't have the problem. I went
>> for 500GB RAID Edition drives. Faster, WAY longer lifetime, all the
>> features required for RAID, but a bit more expensive and less space.
> what on earth is "raid edition"? makes all my BS indicators flash red...
> i can't imagine any special hardware feature "required for raid".

Different firmware. And spec'ed for 24x7 operation (maybe just tested
better?). I think I remember some timeouts are different so that a drive
will not "hang" an array while it tries to recalibrate or something like
that.

Once I had 8 WD 500G "server level" drives in a raid array. Every once
in a while one would just drop from the array. No reason. Went nuts
trying to figure out what was wrong. A power cycle of the drive and it
would work as new. Ended up being a firmware problem in the drive (!).
WD's response was pathetic. Server drives, consumer drives, I think it
is just a matter of having luck with the right fabrication batch and
firmware - I never buy the latest model.

-- Fernando

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Dec 25 08:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 25 2010 - 08:15:02 EET