Re: [LAU] LAC submissions

From: Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 07 2011 - 10:11:03 EET

On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 06:41 +0000, andy baxter wrote:
> On 07/01/11 00:29, Robin Gareus wrote:
> >> If so, it might be a bit clearer for people not used to the academic
> >> thing if you changed the wording on the web page to make this obvious.
> > Thanks for bringing this up. I'll look into it tomorrow.
> >
> > Maybe it's the term "Camera ready" [1] that's somewhat confusing.
> > I think I'll just remove that since it's basically an internal deadline
> > and I'll add a note that papers should be as complete as possible when
> > being submitted.
>
> P.S. I think the bit that confused me is just that there are two
> deadlines listed for papers to be submitted - the January 15th one and
> the 'camera ready papers' one. What would help is if you said a bit more
> clearly what the submission and review process actually entails, rather
> than just listing the deadlines.

Isn't this just common practices for academic conferences, however? All
those I've been to (in the Engineering and Computer Science fields) have
similar terminology.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jan 7 12:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 07 2011 - 12:15:02 EET