Re: [LAU] OT - impulse response recording

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Jan 30 2011 - 14:22:22 EET

On Sunday 30 January 2011 11:34:31 Hartmut Noack wrote:
> Am 28.01.2011 13:23, schrieb fons@email-addr-hidden:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:40:00AM -0500, Michal Seta wrote:
> >> A friend of mine would like to record some impulse response of various
> >> spaces. I don't know the details nor the ultimate goal of this
> >> undertaking but the problem was about the bst equipment for such
> >> recordings. I know a loud signal is needed (she has a starter gun for
> >> that purpose) but unclear about what kind of microphones should be
> >> used. Any tips? Ideas? experiences?
> >
> > Starter guns, electric sparks, exploding balloons or preservatives,
> > etc. are not the best way to do this. You get a much more accurate
> > result and a much better S/N ratio using a sine sweep and deconvolution
> > instead.
>
> This is true if you want perfectly exact, high fidelity, realistic
> response-files of real rooms.
>
> But if you just want files, that produce interesting sounding
> reverb-effects, enything that fits, fits.
>
> I use to record rooms using my mobile-phones puny videofunction, the
> built-in micro and finger snapping ;-)
> Not hi-fi at all and I would distribute these files claiming they would
> be something like tools to reproduce the original rooms. But I like,
> what I hear, if I load them into a convolver....

Using a mobile phone to play the sinus-sweep and record it with a small mp3-
player should give you the ability to "measure" different source and target
positions in the acoustic space :-)

Gotta try that some day.

Have fun,

Arnold

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Received on Sun Jan 30 16:15:04 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 30 2011 - 16:15:04 EET