Re: [LAU] Laid to rest is Pro Tools LE"...

From: drew Roberts <zotz@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 04 2011 - 17:42:04 EET

On Friday 04 March 2011 10:23:00 Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On 3/3/11, david wrote:
> >> Bedroom software developers have never had to learn to
> >> eat their own dogfood.
> >
> > Actually, that is why many of the apps are the way they are. Their
> > developers made them that way because they do use them, often daily.
> > (Many open source apps came about because some programmer had an itch,
> > and scratched it.) It works fine for them, so why should they change it
> > to fit some "amateur's idea" of how the program should work?
>
> Ah, one of my favourite topics :)
>
> The thing is that you don't break it down to a programmer that his app
> sucks. You tell him how to make his app even better than it now is, in
> a way that would keep his workflow more or less along the same lines
> while improbing every other bit. And with time you can even convince
> him/her to improve workflow. I've been doing that for years, and guess
> what ­-- it works.

+1

Well put.
>
> Alexandre Prokoudine
> http://libregraphicsworld.org

all the best,

drew

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Mar 4 20:15:03 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 04 2011 - 20:15:03 EET