this was the main drawback to SynthBuilder which was a product I worked with/on while I was Director of Content at Staccato Systems back in the late 90's
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Renato <rennabh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
but pro level has nothing to do with user friendliness. I mean of
course we want the linux audio environment to improve, but that has
nothing to do with a pretty DE where you don't need to use the terminal
or tweak one or two .conf files
Actually I would disagree. Yes whether a tool can be sued for professional projects is one thing, but the difference is in speed.
I watched a product demo of the new version of Ableton Live and Max for Live in Barcelona last year and the main emphasis was 'making a tune in real-time' & 'not letting the app get in the way of workflow' etc etc. These are pro needs in a pro environment that don't apply to sitting in a bedroom and uploading your pieces to Soundcloud which allows one to tweak around on the command line and groom .conf files.These days a professional level tool is one that allows you to accomplish your task as quickly as possible with as few distractions as possible. This is generally also inferred to be user friendliness, but not necessarily, it does however mean that you shouldn't need to spend time doing extra things that could be done for you, like configure your OS just so you can work;)
same here - Ardour and Pd are my weapons of choice as an electro-acoustic music composer!
Seablade
Who has used and continues to use Linux for professional projects.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Mar 5 00:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 05 2011 - 00:15:02 EET