Re: [LAU] Jack vs. Alsa, PianoTeq demo: Alsa wins!

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Jun 12 2011 - 23:23:43 EEST

On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Aaron Krister Johnson
<aaron@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Hi Paul-
> I'm not sure if what you're saying matters, since the buffer settings, etc.
> were the same between jack and alsa settings in the PianoTeq setup
> dialogs....unless I'm missing something, the /proc directory info you are
> asking me to compare with jackd settings verify that they were the same.

oops, i somehow missed this in the thread. the settings cannot be the
same because PianoTeq doesn't control the JACK settings. just run the
command i mentioned and that will let you see how ALSA gets configured
by PT and then we can compare it with the way JACK does it.

> Best,
> AKJ
> P.S. Did you get my email ever about jackctl.py? Not the one in the jack
> source tree, but my CL utility of the same name that I wrote?

yeah, its in the backlog at present. its functionality overlaps quite
a lot of other stuff.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jun 13 00:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 13 2011 - 00:15:02 EEST