On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:23:28 -0400
Joe Hartley <jh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:06:40 +0200
> rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 06/26/2011 02:54 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > > The downside for OpenBox (not xmonad) is that it seems not very
> > > actively developed in the last year or so, not much releases or even
> > > git commits.
> > You could try Fluxbox instead. That project is still pretty active afaik.
>
> Fluxbox is Openbox's successor and is still in very active development.
> I like it a lot and use it on all my machines, not just the studio
> machine. I've never had a problem running either gnome or kde apps
> under it.
>
I rather think OpenBox achieved what it set out to do - be a fast, light,
highly configurable window manager - so apart from bug fixes what development
would be needed?
I find it ideal.
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Mon Jun 27 00:15:04 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 27 2011 - 00:15:05 EEST