Re: [LAU] About Algorithms

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:55:34 -0400
Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Dale Powell <dj_kaza@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Agree on the whole that summing is summing is summing. Most DAWs these days
> > will use floating point (either 32bit or double precision) and A+B=C no
> > matter what.
>
> Isn't all this "A+B=C" stuff (or A*x+B*y=C as one person stated)
> actually begging the question a bit? Are we certain that every DAW
> implements their mixer that way? Isn't it possible that some might
> try to model analog mixers to some degree?
>
> I'm not arguing either way; I have no clue.

I think you'll find that fundamentally an analogue mixer *is* A+B=C

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user