Re: [LAU] lowest usable latency from a USB 1 device?

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Sep 16 2011 - 21:11:35 EEST

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:02 PM, S. Massy <lists@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:33:42PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>> if you can run a USB 1 class compliant audio device on your linux
>> system with lower latency than the current minimum so far posted to
>> this thread, please post with the settings you use and the type of
>> device. if your best performance has already been posted, no need to
>> repeat it.
>>
>> i'll get the ball rolling with 2048 frames. note that we are assuming
>> 2 channels only, but duplex mode (simultaneous capture+playback).
> Pardon my obtuseness, but... Well, are we talking frames per period, as
> in the -p option in jack's audio driver?

in JACK terms, the combination of:

   * sample rate
   * period size (frames per period)
   * number of periods (periods per buffer)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Sep 18 00:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 18 2011 - 00:15:02 EEST