Re: [LAU] lowest usable latency from a USB 1 device?

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:11:35PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:02 PM, S. Massy <lists@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:33:42PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >> if you can run a USB 1 class compliant audio device on your linux
> >> system with lower latency than the current minimum so far posted to
> >> this thread, please post with the settings you use and the type of
> >> device. if your best performance has already been posted, no need to
> >> repeat it.
> >>
> >> i'll get the ball rolling with 2048 frames. note that we are assuming
> >> 2 channels only, but duplex mode (simultaneous capture+playback).
> > Pardon my obtuseness, but... Well, are we talking frames per period, as
> > in the -p option in jack's audio driver?
>
> in JACK terms, the combination of:
>
> * sample rate
> * period size (frames per period)
> * number of periods (periods per buffer)
With my Roland UA25EX I can run JACK with -r48000 -p64 -n3 without any
xruns or stability issue. Anything lower gets dicey.

Cheers,
S.M.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Sep 18 00:15:02 2011