On 10/11/2011 11:36 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> There are at least two good reasons why such a test is
> not valid.
>
> 1. The difference signal doesn't tell you anything about
> audible differences between two signals. It's fairly easy
> to make a linear filter (no compression involved) with
> a perfectly flat response and that nobody would be able
> to hear. But when you take the difference between in and
> out it is 3 dB higher than both.
>
> 2. Lossy compression is based on combined temporal and
> spectral masking - some signals you can't hear in the
> presence of others. Of course when you take away the
> masking signal they become apparent...
Makes a lot of sense, thanks!
BTW: Apparently the guy in the link has lifted the idea from this clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzJbjHc6bRE
where George Massenburg does the same. I don't know George Massenburg,
but he supposedly is some kine of authority in the world of audio
engineering. Not that it makes the test more valid...
-- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Oct 12 00:15:04 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 12 2011 - 00:15:04 EEST