On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Egor Sanin <egor.sanin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 10/25/11, Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoudine@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Charles Henry <czhenry@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> In your opinion, what kind of tools should we use to organize such a
>>> project? like websites, wiki, mailing list, repository, etc... ?
>>
>> I'm not Egor :), but you could just use Google Code and a Google
>> group.
> My apologies for not responding earlier!
>
> I personally am very much against Google for this sort of thing. I
> feel that in the event their tools are used for organization, the
> ignorant mass will automatically assume that Google is doing linux a
> favour and somehow contributing to this project.
A main item we want to have is support for binary files--I think this
is handled well with git, right?
The code itself (VHDL or Verilog) is hardware independent, but a
compiled file is specific for a particular FPGA device. Users won't
ever want to have to build from source--just flash binaries.
Chuck
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Oct 26 00:15:04 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 26 2011 - 00:15:05 EEST