On 03/17/2012 02:24 PM, Adam wrote:
> Adam wrote:
>> From what you and others have said here, and user reviews online, I've
>> ordered a Behringer UCA-202 from Amazon.
>
> Just to follow up, I've been using the Behringer UCA-202 for a few days
> now on some of my analog recordings. So far I'm quite happy with it and
> would recommend it to others looking for an inexpensive (under US $40)
> but decent way to digitize existing analog recordings. The only
> "configuration" needed was "set AUDIODEV=hw:1" in the terminal window
> I'm using for 'rec'. Thanks again for everyone's suggestions, and
> especially for pointing me toward useful tools I was totally unaware of.
On my Sid system, sometimes the UCA comes up on HW:1, sometimes HW:0. On
Debian Lenny, telling JACK to use "hw:default" was most consistent, but
Sid seems to have changed that. So sometimes hw:1 is the laptop's
built-in Intel audio.
-- David gnome@email-addr-hidden authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun Mar 18 08:15:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 18 2012 - 08:15:01 EET