Re: [LAU] klang

From: michael noble <looplog@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 02 2012 - 12:16:41 EEST

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of KLANG does not seem to
>> react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
>>
> I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
> you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
> end of KLANG then!"
>
> Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?

I don't think this is about the Internet so much, and nor is it a
pissing match. The guy basically came out and said *everything* in
linux audio is broken, and the only way to fix it is to start
everything from scratch. With everything in life, if you take an
extreme position you should expect extreme responses, and also be
prepared to back up your claims.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Aug 2 12:15:02 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 02 2012 - 12:15:02 EEST