Ecasound or Nama may indeed be a better fit for this users project. The
only real disadvantage I can think of in my program is that automation
is currently limited to track and submix volumes, so if you need to
de-ess or kill noise for a few seconds somewhere, you'd have to jump
through a few hoops.
For the record:
1 The delay based panning is quite neat and it obviously only affects
mono tracks. Stereo tracks can be balanced in the traditional way.
2 Not sure what the gripe is about integers. My summing is exact
because of it. The effects are 64 bit double floats.
3 Yes, it is stereo, not surround sound if that's what was meant.
4 The session and audio files can be in a different directory than the
binary.
On 11/22/2012 08:16 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:02:05PM -0500, Peter Lutek wrote:
>
>
>> seriously.... Mixer4 does a lot of exactly that, and is
>> an offline, text-based program. (think Lilypond, but for audio.)
>>
>
> seriously...
>
> * Closed source.
> * Session files and binary in the same directory...
> * No editing.
> * Integers only.
> * Stereo only.
> * Delay based panning...
> * ...
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Nov 22 20:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 22 2012 - 20:15:02 EET