>> Is this something that might be integrated into a jack release? Would
it be worth filing a bug?
>
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand exactly what you're asking.
> <jokes> And no I don't see it being integrated </jokes>
>
> Running JACK as a system wide daemon has downsides, and is a pretty niche
use case. I don't
> see it becoming the standard as GStreamer / Phonon / PulseAudio and a
variety of other frameworks
> already try to run a daemonized audio server. And I remove all of them
from my installs when I can :)
>
> Since its only advanced users that will ever want to do this, I think the
config files fix above is fine.
> My two cents, -Harry
Understood, but a jack group containing users that can connect to any jackd
would be nice and I think a lot of people would benefit.
- Grant
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Dec 12 04:15:03 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 12 2012 - 04:15:03 EET