Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

From: Ricardus Vincente <wizardofgosz@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Dec 24 2012 - 17:13:01 EET

On 12/24/2012 03:59 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> 44.1 was a compromise to get enough minutes on a CD, later when consumer
> DAT was introduced it wasn't needed to take care about the length, so
> they came with 48 KHz.

 I was always told that 44.1 was chosen because they wanted to be able
to reproduce signals up to 20K, but the other 2.05K of audio was needed
for the low-pass filters of the day.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Dec 24 20:15:03 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 24 2012 - 20:15:03 EET