Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:13:01AM -0500, Ricardus Vincente wrote:
> On 12/24/2012 03:59 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > 44.1 was a compromise to get enough minutes on a CD, later when consumer
> > DAT was introduced it wasn't needed to take care about the length, so
> > they came with 48 KHz.
>
> I was always told that 44.1 was chosen because they wanted to be able
> to reproduce signals up to 20K, but the other 2.05K of audio was needed
> for the low-pass filters of the day.

And those of today, that hasn't changed.

44100 was chosen for a mix of reasons, the wikipedia article
referred to earlier explains all of them very well.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user