Re: [LAU] So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

From: hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Wed Feb 06 2013 - 18:19:08 EET

Am 06.02.2013 16:49, schrieb Al Thompson:
> I had to laugh at this. Every once in a while, I will search to see if
> there are any new LADSPA or LV2 plugins. I often see plugins described
> by their mathematical function, with NO hint of what it actually does.
> If linux audio would like to get its foot in the door with guitarists,
> defining available plugins only by math function is not the way to go
> about it. It almost seems like some plugins exists only because they
> were someone's class assignment (write a plugin using FFT).
Usually I wouldn't answer on this topic, even if I have some concerns,
but I will repeat on this.
Because my last announcements here on this list was exactly about LV2
plug-ins for guitarist which indeed use at least FFT.
> This release introduce the first LV2 plugs created from the guitarix
> amps. Well, they will perfectly fit into hotel sierra
>
> * GxAmplifier tube 12ax7 tonestack sovtek cabinet 4x12
> * GxAmplifier-II tube 12AT7 tonestack soldano cabinet AC30
> * GxAmplifier-III tube 6C16 tonestack bassman cabinet 1x15
> * GxAmplifier-IV tube 6V6 tonestack soldano cabinet mesa
> * GxAmplifier-V tube 6DJ8 tonestack ampeg cabinet HighGain
>
> there are mono and stereo versions of those amps included in the bundle

The time were I have to wrote class assignments is a couple of years ago.
I fail to see any description by math function.
But as well, I fail to see any user feedback at all on this.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 6 20:15:03 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 20:15:03 EET