On 02/06/2013 05:19 PM, hermann meyer wrote:
> Am 06.02.2013 16:49, schrieb Al Thompson:
>> I had to laugh at this. Every once in a while, I will search to see if
>> there are any new LADSPA or LV2 plugins. I often see plugins described
>> by their mathematical function, with NO hint of what it actually does.
>> If linux audio would like to get its foot in the door with guitarists,
>> defining available plugins only by math function is not the way to go
>> about it. It almost seems like some plugins exists only because they
>> were someone's class assignment (write a plugin using FFT).
> Usually I wouldn't answer on this topic, even if I have some concerns,
> but I will repeat on this.
> Because my last announcements here on this list was exactly about LV2
> plug-ins for guitarist which indeed use at least FFT.
>> This release introduce the first LV2 plugs created from the guitarix
Whilst being a standalone project (i.e not a DAW/authoring tool) this is
one linux audio project which seems really committed to
interoperability. Its a huge effort to develop this way.
A question someone asked a thread or two back, do you suffer from not
enough feedback from users?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 6 20:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 06 2013 - 20:15:04 EET