Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?

From: James Stone <jamesmstone@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 07 2013 - 12:33:33 EET

Ooops.. Sorry - just seen this was discussed last month.]

Please ignore the noise!

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Stone <jamesmstone@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Are there any advantages to using 96k (or 48k?) if the final target is
> 44.1k/16bit? I am thinking that tracking at 44.1k / 24 bit should be
> more than sufficient for most (non-pro) purposes?
>
> I read somewhere about higher bitrate being important for headroom for
> audio processing plugins, but does samplerate also have an effect on
> this?
>
> James
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 7 12:15:06 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 07 2013 - 12:15:06 EET