[LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?

From: cunnilinux himself <cunnilinux@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 07 2013 - 13:34:47 EET

subj.

just interested about your POSITIVE motivation (if any).
i'm intended to write about mine own a bit later... ;)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 7 16:15:02 2013

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Nils Gey: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Previous message: James Stone: "Re: [LAU] Tracking at 44.1 vs. 48k vs 96k?"
Next in thread: Nils Gey: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Nils Gey: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Harry van Haaren: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Brett McCoy: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Len Ovens: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Maybe reply: Alf Haakon Lund: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Johannes Kroll: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Jostein Chr. Andersen: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Reply: Devin Anderson: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"
Maybe reply: cunnilinux himself: "Re: [LAU] and now, what do you think RULES about Linux audio ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 07 2013 - 16:15:02 EET