On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> For what it's worth, my workflow is to use timemachine to record - this
> follows the unix principle of do just one thing but do it well. It is actually
> dependent on jack on the input side, and will save to several different
> formats. It also gives you a handy 10 second pre-record. Once I have the
> recording safely on disk I then use whatever programs I like to do the
> processing.
Hadn't see this program before. Interesting. Not for me, but it's nice
to know. I'm playing a live track over a prerecording background
generated from a MMA midi.
> The greatest bugbear of using audacity directly for recording is that it uses
> portaudio which doesn't create any connections until you actually send it data.
Yeah, I've heard others mention this. Why is it a problem?
-- **** Listen to my CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** EMAIL: bob@email-addr-hidden WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu Feb 14 04:15:05 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 14 2013 - 04:15:05 EET