Re: [LAU] 32 vs 64 bit distro?

From: Gene Heskett <gheskett@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 14 2013 - 11:10:06 EET

On Thursday 14 February 2013 04:09:44 Rustom Mody did opine:

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:32 AM, david <gnome@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > On 02/04/2013 11:29 PM, James Stone wrote:
> >> Is there any advantage in using a 64 bit distro for audio? Do the
> >> advantages outweigh the difficulties?
> >>
> >> I'm expecting a new computer to be delivered today and am trying to
> >> decide what to install...
> >
> > What difficulties? I run both 32- and 64-bit Linuxes, and have no
> > difficulties with either one.
>
> I have a Canon printer that runs on my 32 bit desktop
> Ive not yet got it running on my new 64 bit laptop
> [Note: Canon supplies 32 and 64 bit rpms but only 32 bit debs]

"alien" should fix that.

Cheers, Gene

-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up!
My views 
<http://www.armchairpatriot.com/What%20Has%20America%20Become.shtml>
BOFH excuse #257:
That would be because the software doesn't work.
I was taught to respect my elders, but its getting 
harder and harder to find any...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 14 12:15:03 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 14 2013 - 12:15:04 EET