Re: [LAU] Some new Bach

From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 14 2013 - 17:39:03 EET

On 02/14/2013 10:31 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden
> <mailto:dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
>
> Picturesque, but not historically accurate, I'm sure you know.
> More like, where melody and melody collided. :)
>
>
> if line 1 and line 2 do not intersect in a harmonious way, is it still
> counterpoint? would anyone call it that?

Since "harmonious" is a loaded term - are we referring to a vertical
sonority or a horizontal progression - I'll venture a "Why not ?". After
a course in Modus Novus it's surprising what sounds harmonious. :)

But then I'm a great lover of Schoenberg and his disciples, so my
definition of "harmonious" is probably rather suspect.

Best,

dp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 14 20:15:06 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 14 2013 - 20:15:06 EET