Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel

From: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 18 2013 - 22:44:58 EET

Il 18/02/2013 21:36, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden ha scritto:
> If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why
> isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in
> Linux Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not
> having a lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the
> Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do
> they ?
>

You can find some information here:
http://www.jackaudio.org/realtime_vs_realtime_kernel

I don't use a RT kernel, I manage to get good low latency with the
hardware I have.

-- 
Federico
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Feb 19 00:15:04 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 19 2013 - 00:15:04 EET