Il 18/02/2013 21:36, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden ha scritto:
> If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why
> isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in
> Linux Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not
> having a lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the
> Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do
> they ?
>
You can find some information here:
http://www.jackaudio.org/realtime_vs_realtime_kernel
I don't use a RT kernel, I manage to get good low latency with the
hardware I have.
-- Federico _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Feb 19 00:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 19 2013 - 00:15:04 EET