Re: [LAU] Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why
> isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in Linux
> Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not having a
> lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the
> Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do they
> ?

Ubuntu Studio uses low-latency kernel by default, and I am pretty sure
some of the other multimedia distros do also.

-- 
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
    -- Jelaleddin Rumi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user