Re: [LAU] What is the best MP3 encoder?

From: Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Apr 03 2013 - 04:16:44 EEST

On Tue, April 2, 2013 7:36 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:33 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 15:34 +0200, Peder Hedlund wrote:
>> > Your car can probably do 140 mph even though you never go that fast.
>> > Being able to use the card in 192 kHz probably doesn't cost that much
>> > extra for the manufacturer and I guess the marketing department really
>> > loves being able to use it in the advertising.
>>
>> Yes, it's the second sentence :D
>> http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_hdspe_aio.php .

RME has no choice really. If they want their gear to be used to make
bluray sound tracks, they have to support 192k. This is the certification
needed by equipment for that use. True, the sound is not any better than
if the studio used 48k and resampled the finished product to 192k (maybe
worse). but this is not about sound quality or RME doing marketing... it
is Hollywood doing the marketing...

-- 
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Apr 3 04:15:02 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 03 2013 - 04:15:02 EEST