Re: [LAU] One or two HD's for audio work

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Fri Apr 05 2013 - 04:10:26 EEST

On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 18:25 -0400, Brett McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Grekim Jennings
> <grekimj@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > What's the latest consensus? Is it recommended to have a separate drive
> > for audio on a Linux system? Separate partition? I'm just wondering about
> > performance, not practical issues like moving audio around or reinstalling
> > the system, etc. As we know there are Mac/PC DAW's that need things
> > separate. Thanks.
>
> Yes, OS on one drive, audio on a separate dedicated drive is best for
> performance (and if you are using a sampler, the samples should be on
> their own dedicated drive, if possible). Pretty standard practice for
> audio or video workstation, regardless of OS.

I don't think that this usually is needed, using one drive with one
partition IMO usually isn't a bottleneck. It's IMO useful to separate
drives regarding to convenience, but not regarding to performance.

I might be mistaken, but I can't see a reason for a reasonably machine
to use 3 HDDs for audio production, to get a better performance.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Apr 5 04:15:03 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 05 2013 - 04:15:03 EEST